For this month’s poll, readers were assessed
with queries addresses the public’s perception on GM products. When
queried on whether they would buy GM products, 45% of readers were positive,
while 32% responded negatively, with a further 23% furnishing a possibility.
Similarly, when queried on whether they would pay more to buy non-GM products,
64% responded that they would not, compared with 32% who responded that
they would.
On the subject of GM labeling, most readers (69%) believe that GM products
should be labeled, in contrast to 28% who responded negatively and a
further 3% believes it is possible. Similarly, readers generally believe
(60%) that the enforcement of GM labeling is practical, contrasted by
a 40% of readers who believe otherwise. Those polled also understand
that the costs required to ensure and enforce proper GM labeling is
justified (52%), contrasted by a 39% who believes that this cost is
not justified, with 9% believe that it would be possibly justified.
Lastly, readers polled generally do not believe (56%) that GM labeling
would determine the halal status of the products, however 20% of readers
polled raised the possibility that it might, followed by a further 20%
believing it would.